CORPORATISING IS NO ACCIDENT, IT’S A CHOICE

A real point of difference has emerged in the type of adviser and planning businesses Securitor are attracting, and it centres on the process of corporatisation.

For a while now, it has been clear that to be efficient, proficient and profitable in the post-FOFA world and beyond, planning businesses need to corporatise their offering.

That is, practices must have systems and processes in place to ensure the business (not an individual) delivers on and tracks the promises made to clients.

This model represents quite a change from the past, in particular for those businesses that have advisers who happen to be ‘accidental owners’.

For those who have often used their business as an annuity income stream without investing in it, face a tough future and their businesses will struggle. I can say this because I have seen the different journeys of those businesses that have gone down the corporatised path and those who have not – the differences are stark.

The businesses that are and will continue to thrive are those that have a work flow system in place which enables a focus on productivity. This will deliver efficiency improvements, and most importantly, ensure the practice delivers on its promises to clients – first time every time.

But achieving this model is not easy. It requires some hard conversations regarding strategy, an investment in workflow systems technology and a detailed analysis of the cost to serve the different segments of both the current and future clients of the business.

If it can be delivered, centres of influence (COIs) will have line of sight for the work being done for their clients, while CEOs will better understand where work is coming from and how to continue to market to that channel.

Finally, investments in technology will allow the business to engage its clients via tools, such as social media, as they will now be able to track the conversion rate / engagement rate for clients who want to engage in this way.

Matt Englund is managing director of Securitor and Licensee Select

The opinions, advice, or views expressed in this content are those of the author or the presenter alone and do not represent the opinions, advice or views of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd. Our contents are prepared by our own staff and third parties who are responsible for their own contents. Any advice in this content is general advice only without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. You should consider any general advice considering these matters and relevant product disclosure statements. You should also obtain your own independent advice before making financial decisions. Please also refer to our FSG available here: http://www.nmpeducation.com.au/financial-services-guide/.

Honda or Tesla – it seems obvious, right?

If electric cars are the future of transportation, then Tesla is truly at the vanguard.

Your clients are probably already quite familiar with the company, and might have even seen a few charging stations for Tesla cars here and there. This is why, to many, buying Tesla shares seems like a good investment.

Conversely, an older company like Honda looks like investing in the past – but what if there were aspects about the two companies, and the world at large, that meant the opposite was true?

This piece by Orbis Investments explores that very idea.

In this piece, you will learn:

  • The current global market for electric vehicles
  • The dangers of “hype” in the stock market
  • Characteristics of Honda and Tesla shares