FASEA just eased up on the advice community

Alex Burke,  Senior Writer,  No More Practice Education

Last Friday, FASEA rolled out multiple changes to its professional standards regime and clarified a few others.

FASEA chief executive Stephen Glenfield explained that the changes have come about following extensive stakeholder feedback - around 800 submissions were received.

"The detailed consultation input was valuable to FASEA in creating standards which address industry and consumer needs while at the same time balancing FASEA’s legislative obligations,” he explained/

"The detailed consultation input was valuable to FASEA in creating standards which address industry and consumer needs while at the same time balancing FASEA’s legislative obligations."

Let's go through the key changes:

CPD hours have been reduced

In what will likely come as a relief to many advisers, the total number of CPD hours has been reduced from 50 to 40 each year. 70% of the 40 hours will need to be approved by the adviser's licensee, and there are also a minimum number of hours for particular categories.

These are technical (five hours), client care and practice (five hours), regulatory compliance and consumer protection (five hours) and professionalism and ethics (nine hours.

A new pathway has opened up

Further tailoring the FASEA program, a seventh education pathway has been added to the existing six. The Post Graduate Career Changer pathway will require new entrants to undertake an approved graduate diploma. They will also be eligible for recognition of prior learning "from the education provider as per their credit and RPL guidelines."

Furthermore, FASEA is also clarifying RPL credits for existing advisers. The Advanced Diploma of Financial Planning, for example, will be eligible for two course credits.

The definition of a "related degree" has been revised, too, "and advisers will be able to undertake an AQF8 Graduate Diploma once approved by FASEA."

The announcement continues: "Advisers will be able to seek RPL for the Corporations Act and Behavioural Finance Client and Consumer Behaviour bridging courses. There will be no RPL available for the newly created Code of Ethics bridging course."

There's been additional guidance on foreign qualifications, with FASEA saying it will "will now recognise advisers who have had their assessments already assessed by Department of Education and Training (DET) approved bodies such as CAANZ and CPA.  FASEA will undertake assessment for a fee of foreign qualifications to determine the relevant pathway to meet FASEA’s education standard as part of FASEA’s degree assessment service."

The adviser exam has been simplified

The FASEA exam originally covered four modules; these have been merged into three.

The modules are now "Corporations Act (emphasis on Chapter 7 – Financial services and markets)," "Financial Advice Construction – suitability of advice aligned to different consumer groups, incorporating consumer behaviour and decision making" and "Applied ethical and professional reasoning and communication – incorporating FASEA Code of Ethics and Code Monitoring Bodies."

The exam will last for three-and-a-half hours and will comprise both multiple choice and written responses.

Other changes

Finally, FASEA has also revised its Code of Ethics - covering the "values of Trust, Competence, Honesty, Fairness and Diligence," with case studies available on the website - and clarified that the "Provisional Relevant Provider" can be used interchangeably with "Provisional Financial Planner" and "Provisional Financial Adviser."

Wrapping it up

It's a lot to take in, but it's heartening for industry participants to know the FASEA agenda has been measurably refined through adviser feedback. You can provide submissions on the legislative instruments gradually being released using this email address.

We have exclusive tools and resources coming soon to help guide you through the FASEA education requirements, find out more here. 


The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author shown, and do not necessarily represent those of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd or its related entities. All content is intended for a professional financial adviser audience only and does not constitute financial advice. To view our full terms and conditions, click here.

Liked this article? Let us know [likebtn theme="drop" dislike_enabled="0" icon_dislike_show="0" position="top"]

Want more of the latest in opinions, expert insights and training?

Subscribe to our free eNewsletter now

/ Related content

Key issues with the psyche of the Australian investor

HESTA's chief executive, Debby Blakey, discusses what many Australians are ....

Professional standards timeframe shakeup

Here's what you need to know. 

Michael Holmes cfp

20/11/18

The advisers with the most experience and have completed all prior learning have still been forgotten. I have completed by CFP pre date line, my FChFP pre date line both ignored, then have consistently completed 70 to 90 hours of yearly education, I’m 52, have lost 18 months of possible study time and are been told to go and obtain your degree or your out on your ear. Can the industry loose this experience, I know the clients can’t

Saddened Adviser

20/11/18

Hey Alex. Anyone who thinks Fasea eased up on advisers must've forgotten to take their delusion medication. These Faseans blatantly ignore the parameters they were established under and have acted like militant unions in making staggering ambit claims and then softening those claims to make others think they've been reasonable. What a load of crock! Imagine what would occur if the AMA said all "older" doctors need to requalify and re-do their old degrees just because of a bad doctor = Dr. Death in Qld. The legal and accounting professions have ex-members in gaol too. Should all of them re-sit all their old exams too? Clearly, it's ridiculous. Everyone but the bad advisers wants to be rid of them. But forcing out good people via arbitary dates or decisions is just as ridiculous. You should be aware that the old "degrees" were earned mostly by people who sought and practised professionalism and ethics long before it became popular. Yet these people will be punished under the Fasea regime. Why is an "old" qualification plus experience valued so poorly vs a new "degree"? As you know, advisers must disclose any conflicts, but fascinatingly Fasea board members who are senior members of education providers don't think they have a conflict, even though they may well be enrichened from the Fasea decisions. I wonder how the new ASIC would rationalise that? If common sense doesn't prevail, perhaps half the industry's experience will be lost and then your taxes will rise to pay all those extra folk on welfare because Fasea effectively put them there. It won't happen overnight, but it will happen if old qualifications are made worthless and people are forced out. Put a diary note in your calendar for 10 years to check on how it's going.

Leave a comment /

Related content /

12 August, 2019

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

Key issues with the psyche of the Australian investor

HESTA's chief executive, Debby Blakey, discusses what many Australians are missing when it comes to building their wealth.

Read now

WordPress Lightbox Plugin