Many advisers unsure or negative about work past 2021

Alex Burke,  Senior Writer,  No More Practice Education

As we discussed recently, those advisers who haven't passed the FASEA exam by the end of 2021 will be ineligible to practice in the new year.

The introduction of the FASEA regime has correlated with a significant-enough proportion of advisers leaving the industry - over 8,000 since January 2019 - that even ASIC now considers it a causative factor, as referenced late last year in its affordable advice consultation. While the future of the framework around professional standards seems even more uncertain following news that FASEA is to be wound up, what's clear is that advisers are leaving and there aren't enough new entrants to close the gap.

To determine whether or not this sentiment has shifted over the past few months, NMP Education conducted a survey of its community which found that around 66% of advisers intend to stay in the industry past the FASEA deadline, although a third of this group have yet to complete the adviser exam.

The remaining third of participants in the survey, though, are almost evenly split between those who are undecided whether they'll continue in the industry and those who have decided they won't.

If we take our community survey as representative of the general adviser population in Australia, that could mean at least 3,500 more advisers leaving by the end of the year. And with just 58 provisional advisers on ASIC's register in January, there seems to be very little indication that the industry will be able to recover from these losses in the short term.

As discussed in a separate piece today, the pressures on the advice industry aren't just coming from FASEA requirements: businesses attempting to budget for their levies under the ASIC industry funding model based on initial estimates were shocked to see a 160% increase in amounts owed. Given that there's an additional fee per authorised adviser under a licence, one wonders how much of an incentive there is to bring on new entrants in the first place.

This is one of the reasons the AFA recently argued in a submission that there should be a wage subsidy for advise practices employing Professional Year students. The submission explained that the majority of advice practices are small businesses currently under "tremendous financial strain," but with the right incentive they could both grow and "provide valuable employment opportunities" to students.

The submission argued that a $10,000 subsidy would make a "material difference" in this regard.

Of course, even with such a subsidy in place, it's unclear to what extent it will make up for the losses of so many seasoned advice professionals from the industry. Where to next?

Liked this article? Let us know [likebtn theme="drop" dislike_enabled="0" icon_dislike_show="0" position="top"]

Want more of the latest in opinions, expert insights and training?

Subscribe to our free eNewsletter now

/ Related content

First glimpse of ASIC's affordable advice review

While the regulator's affordable advice project appears to have been slo....

Escaping the minefield of advice remediation 

With new ASIC consumer remediation guidelines on the way and laws following....

The danger zone between general and personal advice

A recent High Court decision highlights how blurred the lines between ge....

Jason Bragger

10/03/21

Its not just the ASIC levy in isolation. While this is an outrageous impost on a struggling industry we need to always be cognisant of the total combined effect of all the extra costs to providing advice rather than talk about each separatly. The TPB is adding 20 hours mandatory CPD for Tax (financial )advisers a year. Unfathomable how this benefits anyone. Consumers don't benefit from the further increase to cost of the advice. Constantly all our regulators act like they are in a vaccuum. Tone deaf to the rest of the symphony to mix my metaphors. Until we have one regulator who looks at the big picture and a government that stops playing politics with the industry the number of licensed of advisers will continue to shrink. Its currently a race to shrink the quickest between the life insurers and the advice community. Drastic action is required by government followed by ASIC to turn the boat around. This will require the regulator to somewhat trust educated qualified experienced advisers and not regulate for the lowest common denominator who ignore regulation anyway.

John Claessen

10/03/21

Alex, really ! why would anyone in their right mind (and I am just hanging in there) want to be part of this vilified and persecuted industry. I love dealing with clients but simply finding it difficult to provide the clients what they want ie clear concise often "scaled" advice affordable advice, presented in less than a 60 pages without my fear of breaching someone's interpretation of Corporate regulations or Ethnics provided now and measured in 10 years time ! As an industry we have been subject to breaches of law by government ie contract law through commission removal and the latest being the Dover advisers being forced to stump up for fines levies on the AFSL. Image in workers were forced to pay for fines levied on their employees or every working Australian forced to sit an Ethics exam in the next 12 months or otherwise there were no longer able to continue to work in that field ! The list is endless but all too late. There will be some Financial Planners left but not many

Leave a comment /

Related content /

14 April, 2021

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

First glimpse of ASIC's affordable advice review

While the regulator's affordable advice project appears to have been slowed down by significant volume of responses from advisers, change may just....

Read now

14 April, 2021

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

Escaping the minefield of advice remediation 

With new ASIC consumer remediation guidelines on the way and laws following on from the Royal Commission kicking into gear in October this year, conce....

Read now

07 April, 2021

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

The danger zone between general and personal advice

A recent High Court decision highlights how blurred the lines between general and personal advice can be to consumers - and how costly it will be f....

Read now