New competency requirements for licensees are incoming

Responding to the new education standards being deployed across the advice industry, ASIC is proposing to introduce new competence requirements for advice licensees.

Explaining the proposed changes, ASIC commissioner Danielle Press said they were “designed to strengthen the organisational competence of financial advice licensees by ensuring that advisers are supervised by at least one responsible manager who satisfies the new education and training standards.”

What are the current requirements?

As per Regulatory Guide 105 Licensing: Organisational competence (RG 105), advice licensees are required to “nominate responsible managers who will have direct responsibility for significant day-to-day decisions about the licensee’s financial services business.”

In order to demonstrate a responsible manager’s knowledge and skills, there are currently five options available. These are:

  1. “Meet widely adopted or relevant industry standard or relevant standard set by APRA,” and possess “three years’ relevant experience of over the past five years”
  2. “Be individually assessed by an authorised assessor as having relevant knowledge equivalent to a diploma,” and possess “five years’ relevant experience over the past eight years”
  3. “Hold a university degree in a relevant discipline and complete a relevant short industry course,” and “three years’ relevant experience over the past five years”
  4. “Hold a relevant industry-specific or product-specific qualification equivalent to a diploma or higher,” and “three years’ relevant experience over the past five years”

The fifth option is more complicated; essentially, if the responsible manager isn’t relying on options one through four, they need to provide a written submission which will satisfy ASIC that they have the appropriate “knowledge and skills for their role.”

What are the changes?

ASIC wants to introduce a sixth option to the above. This would consist of a knowledge component comprising the new FASEA exam as well as FASEA’s degree and CPD requirements. The skills component would be three years’ relevant experience over the past five years.

The changes are open to consultation from industry participants. ASIC wants to know if there are any elements in the proposed changes that shouldn’t apply to responsible managers; whether other elements should be added; whether there’s a better way for option six to reflect FASEA standards; whether the skills component is fair; and whether there’s a better way to satisfy the updated requirements.

“Our proposal seeks to achieve a balance between requiring responsible managers to achieve and maintain the standards expected in the industry,” ASIC explained, “while avoiding any unnecessary requirements.”

What can I do?

As above, all of the proposed changes are currently open for consultation. You can read the relevant paper here.


The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author shown, and do not necessarily represent those of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd or its related entities. All content is intended for a professional financial adviser audience only and does not constitute financial advice. To view our full terms and conditions, click here.

The opinions, advice, or views expressed in this content are those of the author or the presenter alone and do not represent the opinions, advice or views of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd. Our contents are prepared by our own staff and third parties who are responsible for their own contents. Any advice in this content is general advice only without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. You should consider any general advice considering these matters and relevant product disclosure statements. You should also obtain your own independent advice before making financial decisions. Please also refer to our FSG available here: http://www.nmpeducation.com.au/financial-services-guide/.

ASIC questions its role in driving up advice costs

With so many advisers departing the industry, ASIC has opened consultation for how the regulatory environment can be adjusted or clarified to increase the availability and affordability of advice.