NMP ReVue – Tuesday, November 26

Alex Burke,  Senior Writer,  No More Practice Education

ASIC explains adviser Code enforcement

Following consultation with FASEA, ASIC has clarified it will not be enforcing or monitoring individual advisers’ compliance with the Code of Ethics. However, the regulator said it will be taking a “facilitative approach” to compliance with Standards 3 and 7 of the Code until the new adviser disciplinary body is operational.

ASIC will require licensees to take reasonable steps to ensure advisers apply with the new Code. These include:

  • Ensuring advisers know they need to comply with the Code of Ethics from 1 January 2020
  • Providing training and guidance to advisers regarding the Code
  • Facilitating advisers’ ability to raise concerns about how the licensee’s systems and controls may be obstructing their compliance with the Code
  • Regularly monitoring advisers’ Code compliance

Westpac CEO resigns

Westpac chief executive Brian Hartzer is stepping down amidst legal action from AUSTRAC pertaining to over the bank’s alleged 23 million breaches of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism finance laws – most notably failures to monitor customers transferring money to the Philippines in ways considered to be consistent with child exploitation.

Commenting on his departure, Hartzer said he accepts he is “ultimately accountable for everything that happens at the bank,” adding that “it is clear we have fallen short of what the community expects of us and we expect of ourselves.”

Hartzer will be paid $2.69 million while serving out his notice period.  

APRA proposes insurance changes

APRA is proposing measures aimed at “improving superannuation member outcomes by helping trustees select the most appropriate policies for their members, and monitor their ongoing relationships with insurers,” reflecting certain recommendations made by the Royal Commission.

The proposed revisions to Prudential Standard SPS 250 Insurance in Superannuation (SPS 250) will require that beneficiaries can “easily opt out of insurance cover,” that levels and types of insurance cover can’t “inappropriately erode the retirement income of beneficiaries,” and that “any status attributed to a beneficiary in connection with the provision of insurance is fair and reasonable.”

The proposal will also require independent certification that insurance arrangements are in beneficiaries’ best interests.

 


The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author shown, and do not necessarily represent those of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd or its related entities. All content is intended for a professional financial adviser audience only and does not constitute financial advice. To view our full terms and conditions, click here.

Liked this article? Let us know [likebtn theme="drop" dislike_enabled="0" icon_dislike_show="0" position="top"]

Want more of the latest in opinions, expert insights and training?

Subscribe to our free eNewsletter now

/ Related content

NMPE ReVue - Tuesday, December 3

In today's ReVue, we examine:

Why advice is stuck in 1998

There are three key points the industry needs to consider before it can ....

NMPE ReVue - Thursday, November 28

In today's NMPE ReVue, we examine: 

Leave a comment /

Related content /

02 December, 2019

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

Why advice is stuck in 1998

There are three key points the industry needs to consider before it can move into the modern age.

Read now

WordPress Lightbox Plugin