The retirement tsunami and its effects on super strategy

Alex Burke,  Senior Writer,  No More Practice Education

Given that over 2.8 million super accounts will be moving from accumulation to the pension phase over the next decade, is it time to consider the implications of how member assets are pooled?

A new paper from Parametric managing director, research Raewyn Williams argues that the decisions these retirees make - keep their savings in their super fund, change funds, go self-managed or exit the system entirely - will "hugely influence the destiny of superannuation funds, so it’s critical they use their best thinking, and devote adequate resources, to ensure they get this decision right.”

One potential solution, the paper says, is to segregate member assets into separate accumulation and pension pools.

While noting "there's no hard and fast rule on what the best approach is," there are quantifiable benefits for segregation. As one example, the paper cites the "performance drag on international equity pension portfolios from foreign dividend withholding tax."

Williams adds: "This drag—38 basis points on a passive international equity portfolio over 2018—is a permanent cost to pension (but not accumulation) members and can be addressed if super funds can design exposures specifically for pension pools."

She continues: "For another example, consider the idea of ‘franking-credit-tilted’ Australian equities. Our previous research has identified the additional risks introduced into an accumulation portfolio to target this extra source of yield. But does this evaluation change if a segregated pension portfolio can double the extra yield for the same amount of risk—or redefine its definition of risk entirely?

“And how asset segregation would be implemented is also relevant to any decision and shouldn’t be parked for a later investigation.”

Less quantifiable factors included the ability to choose strategies "that better match pension member risk preferences" and setting higher liquidity rules for pension members while harvesting an illiquidity premium for accumulation members.

With an increased focus on how the Australian super system will manage a significant transition of members into retirement, these considerations are more important than ever.


The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author shown, and do not necessarily represent those of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd or its related entities. All content is intended for a professional financial adviser audience only and does not constitute financial advice. To view our full terms and conditions, click here.

Liked this article? Let us know

Want more of the latest in opinions, expert insights and training?

Subscribe to our free eNewsletter now

/ Related content

Libertarian group calls for voluntary superannuation

According to the think tank, "superannuation is not a good deal for ever....

AIST wants AFCA complaint data expanded

The super trustee body says individual super sectors should be called ou....

What does the upcoming election mean for super?

What each of the major parties are planning for superannuation.

Leave a comment /

Related content /

30 May, 2019

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

Libertarian group calls for voluntary superannuation

According to the think tank, "superannuation is not a good deal for everyone."

Read now

09 May, 2019

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

AIST wants AFCA complaint data expanded

The super trustee body says individual super sectors should be called out based on volume of complaints.

Read now

01 May, 2019

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

What does the upcoming election mean for super?

What each of the major parties are planning for superannuation.

Read now

WordPress Lightbox Plugin