Treasury signals support for slashing advice red tape

In its response to the review of the Tax Practitioner’s Board, the Government has announced its in-principle support for the reduction of regulatory overlap in financial advice. 

This sentiment was expressed in response to the recommendation that a new model should be developed in consultation with ASIC, FASEA, the TBP and Treasury for regulating tax advisers. The new model, the review said, should incorporate a single point of registration for individuals, a requirement to abide by a single code of conduct and the requirement that any disciplinary action meted out to a tax adviser should be decided on by experts in the profession. 

The Government’s response was that it is currently assembling a new disciplinary system for all financial advisers, including tax advisers, as part of its commitment to implementing the recommendations made in the final Royal Commission report. Under this system, tax advisers will only be subject to a single disciplinary regime. 

Commenting on Treasury’s response, Assistant Treasurer Michael Sukkar said he believes the Government will be able to implement changes that “will result in a more effective and independent TPB and a reduction in red tape for tax practitioners.” 

He continued: “Implementation of these recommendations will enhance community confidence, and support high standards in the tax profession.” 

The Government’s response to the TPB review follows not long after Treasurer Josh Frydenberg announced that under proposed legislation, parts of industry codes of practice for advisers will be made “enforceable code provisions” in instances where they “relate to commitments made by a code subscriber to the consumer.”

It remains to be seen what enforceable provisions exist (or will come to exist) in the FASEA Code of Ethics, which is currently under fire from industry associations due to a perceived lack of clarity regarding its practical applications. As discussed on Tuesday, there were numerous specific complaints about the standards in the Code as it currently stands – including case studies about the perennial problem of clients not understanding the advice given to them, a subject discussed in the latest season of Secrets of the Money Masters.


The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author shown, and do not necessarily represent those of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd or its related entities. All content is intended for a professional financial adviser audience only and does not constitute financial advice. To view our full terms and conditions, click here

The opinions, advice, or views expressed in this content are those of the author or the presenter alone and do not represent the opinions, advice or views of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd. Our contents are prepared by our own staff and third parties who are responsible for their own contents. Any advice in this content is general advice only without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. You should consider any general advice considering these matters and relevant product disclosure statements. You should also obtain your own independent advice before making financial decisions. Please also refer to our FSG available here: http://www.nmpeducation.com.au/financial-services-guide/.

Closing the data gap

Let’s start with some troubling figures: according to recent projections, there are around 12 million Australians who say they have unfulfilled advice needs. The average

Government finally responds to the QAR

At long last, Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones has outlined the Government’s preliminary response to the Quality of Advice review – and revealed which of Michelle