What do the first FASEA exam results say about advice?

Alex Burke,  Senior Writer,  No More Practice Education

The results are in for the first round of the FASEA Financial Advisers Exam.

A total of 579 advisers sat the exam – encouragingly, over 90% of candidates got a passing mark. Commenting on the results, FASEA chief executive Stephen Glenfield said: "FASEA is pleased with the implementation of the first exam and congratulates successful candidates on completing an important component of their education requirements under the Corporations Act."

"Unsuccessful candidates are able to re-sit the exam," Glenfield continued, "and these advisers will receive guidance on which knowledge areas they need to improve to enhance their ability to pass at a future sitting."

As discussed previously, the exam covers knowledge in three key competency areas: "Financial Advice Regulatory and Legal requirements (including Corporations Act, Chapter7, AML, Privacy and Tax Agents Services Act (TASA) 2009)", "Financial Advice Construction – suitability of advice aligned to different consumer groups, incorporating consumer behaviour and decision making" and "Applied ethical and professional reasoning and communication – incorporating FASEA Code of Ethics and Code Monitoring Bodies."

That such a significant proportion of inaugural exam candidates passed the test – although FASEA did note that “the exam is marked to credit standard and the pass rate will vary with each exam” – is a positive step for the advice industry.

While some industry commentators have opined that this proves the exam was unnecessary, such a high pass rate is a clear communication to the public that advisers are more than up to the task of demonstrating their capability and professionalism to the public.

Registrations for the September exam sittings are currently open, and you’ll be able to take the exam in more than 15 locations – you can find more information here.


The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author shown, and do not necessarily represent those of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd or its related entities. All content is intended for a professional financial adviser audience only and does not constitute financial advice. To view our full terms and conditions, click here.

 

Liked this article? Let us know [likebtn theme="drop" dislike_enabled="0" icon_dislike_show="0" position="top"]

Want more of the latest in opinions, expert insights and training?

Subscribe to our free eNewsletter now

/ Related content

The "political football" facing the FASEA extension

Leadership in unions and Government have slammed the delays in passing t....

The Government and ASIC have delayed key adviser reforms

Here's how COVID-19 has impacted Royal Commission implementation and oth....

Research shows which fee models thrive during the pandemic

According to new figures, there's a clear winner during COVID-19 when it....

Leave a comment /

Related content /

21 May, 2020

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

The "political football" facing the FASEA extension

Leadership in unions and Government have slammed the delays in passing the FASEA extension bill.

Read now

14 May, 2020

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

The Government and ASIC have delayed key adviser reforms

Here's how COVID-19 has impacted Royal Commission implementation and other measures.

Read now

07 May, 2020

Alex Burke,Senior Writer,No More Practice Education

Research shows which fee models thrive during the pandemic

According to new figures, there's a clear winner during COVID-19 when it comes to adviser business models.

Read now