The FASEA mismatch that could quadruple adviser CPD hours

The Tax Practitioners Board’s review of its continuing professional education (CPE) policy has attracted some consternation within the advice community.

As per a submission from the FPA, consultation with multiple tax (financial) advisers has yielded feedback that the TPB’s draft policy is confusing, creates unnecessary additional work for advisers and doesn’t align with existing timeframes for other CPD requirements.

The root of the problem appears to be that the draft policy doesn’t unconditionally accept the CPD completed for FASEA purposes as meeting the TPB’s requirements, despite the fact that, as the FPA notes, “the TPB [has] mirrored many of the FASEA requirements in the proposed amendments to its CPE policy.”

What this could mean in practice is that tax (financial) advisers would be required to complete an additional 120 hours of CPE on top of the 40 hours stipulated under FASEA.

The submission also notes that practitioners are confused regarding what tax (financial) advice services aren’t also personal financial advice services under the Corporations Act and, as a result, what topics in the TPB’s CPE policy aren’t mirrored in FASEA’s CPD requirements.

The submission continues: “The FPA has continued to request Treasury and the TPB provide clear examples of TFA services that fall outside the definition of personal financial advice since the proposed application of the Tax Agent Services Act to financial planners in 2008.

“Clear examples of services and circumstances in which a financial planner would be providing a tax (financial) advice service, but not personal financial advice, would help the profession identify the gaps in the CPE undertaken for FASEA purposes.”

Without further clarification, the FPA argues, the TPB’s proposed policy will create “additional red tape for financial planners that will provide no extra benefit for consumers. Rather, it will drive up the cost of financial advice for Australians.”


The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author shown, and do not necessarily represent those of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd or its related entities. All content is intended for a professional financial adviser audience only and does not constitute financial advice. To view our full terms and conditions, click here

The opinions, advice, or views expressed in this content are those of the author or the presenter alone and do not represent the opinions, advice or views of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd. Our contents are prepared by our own staff and third parties who are responsible for their own contents. Any advice in this content is general advice only without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. You should consider any general advice considering these matters and relevant product disclosure statements. You should also obtain your own independent advice before making financial decisions. Please also refer to our FSG available here: http://www.nmpeducation.com.au/financial-services-guide/.

Closing the data gap

Let’s start with some troubling figures: according to recent projections, there are around 12 million Australians who say they have unfulfilled advice needs. The average

Government finally responds to the QAR

At long last, Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones has outlined the Government’s preliminary response to the Quality of Advice review – and revealed which of Michelle