The long-term damage FASEA could do to the investment market

Last week, we discussed some of the comments made by ASIC chair Joe Longo during a parliamentary committee hearing.

While that hearing gave Longo the opportunity to outline his interpretation of Josh Frydenberg’s Statement of Expectations and ASIC’s refreshed agenda, the main topic of discussion was capital concentration in Australia. And although much of the hearing focused on capital concentration with respect to the trajectory of holdings in the superannuation sector, a recent submission from the Stockbrokers and Financial Advisers Association (SAFAA) suggests a different target: FASEA. 

In the submission, SAFAA CEO Judith Fox said: “Investment by Australian superannuation funds is not the problem in relation to the capacity of ordinary Australians to invest in the listed equities market. The problem is the regulatory framework governing access to investment advice and capital raisings, which needs to be reformed.” 

Fox argued that because “access to good-quality investment advice” is becoming unavailable to many Australians, retail investors “will increasingly be left with the choice of either DIY trading online with no advice or advice from a financial planner who has minimal direct expertise in listed investments and markets.” 

And the reason for this? A policy framework that refuses to acknowledge and accommodate for the different types of financial advice in the market. 

Fox explained: “The increased and unhelpful regulatory burden on the provision of financial advice is a consequence of government policy and legislation. SAFAA has long advocated for Government and ASIC to revisit the regulatory settings around the provision of advice to retail clients and to move away from a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach.

“FASEA’s lack of understanding about what stockbrokers and investment advisers do and importantly, how that differs from financial planning, has led to a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to financial advice that ultimately disenfranchises retail investors.”

Because FASEA treats all advisers as financial planners, Fox added, “notwithstanding the differences between the financial planning advice model where advice is provided on all aspects of a client’s financial circumstances and stockbrokers and investment advisers who provide scaled advice on a client’s investments and shares. They are different forms of advice serving different client needs.”

 


The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author shown, and do not necessarily represent those of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd or its related entities. All content is intended for a professional financial adviser audience only and does not constitute financial advice. To view our full terms and conditions, click here

The opinions, advice, or views expressed in this content are those of the author or the presenter alone and do not represent the opinions, advice or views of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd. Our contents are prepared by our own staff and third parties who are responsible for their own contents. Any advice in this content is general advice only without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. You should consider any general advice considering these matters and relevant product disclosure statements. You should also obtain your own independent advice before making financial decisions. Please also refer to our FSG available here: http://www.nmpeducation.com.au/financial-services-guide/.

Closing the data gap

Let’s start with some troubling figures: according to recent projections, there are around 12 million Australians who say they have unfulfilled advice needs. The average

Government finally responds to the QAR

At long last, Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones has outlined the Government’s preliminary response to the Quality of Advice review – and revealed which of Michelle